|
<
Library - Employment Law
Wage Claims, Overtime & Other Employee Compensation
BEING AN
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR OR 1099 WORKER:
IS IT GOOD OR BAD FOR YOU?
|
Q:
I am a registered nurse
working for a nursing registry in California. The
nursing registry provides temporary nursing services to
hospitals and care facilities. I am not affiliated with
any other nursing registry. I am considered an
independent contractor by my employer and received a
1099 for the most recent tax year. According to my
accountant, I am an employee and should receive a W-2.
Does it make a difference whether I am classified as an
independent contractor or an employee? |
A: Yes, it does.
Independent contractors are not employees and, therefore, do not
have the same rights and protections that employees enjoy. Employees
are entitled to the following rights and benefits guaranteed by the
Labor Code and the Wage Orders:
1) the right to minimum wage
2) the right to overtime pay
3) the right to the employer’s share of the social
security, unemployment and disability taxes
4) workers’ compensation protection
5) additional benefits granted by employers to
employees such as sick pay, retirement and profit-sharing plans
6) protection from discrimination
7) protection from wrongful termination of employment
Persons classified as independent contractors are not
entitled to any of the above rights and benefits. Hence, they
cannot, for example, assert their rights to minimum wage or overtime
payment. Unlike employees, independent contractors are not paid one
and half times the regular hourly rate when they work more than 8
hours per day or more than 40 hours per week. They cannot claim
Social Security, unemployment, or disability benefits or avail of
worker’s compensation benefits when they are injured at work. It is
to the worker’s benefit, therefore, that he or she be correctly
treated as an employee.
It is a common misconception that just because the
worker has agreed to be classified as an independent contractor and
has agreed to receive a 1099, that therefore, the worker has been
correctly classified as an independent corrector. This is not so.
The independent contractor status is determined by law, not by the
parties’ agreement.
Although the law does not define the term “independent
contractor” the courts and enforcement authorities provide guidance.
How can a worker know that he or she has been correctly classified
as an independent contractor?
Courts consider the following factors to determine
whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor:
1. The employer’s right to control the manner and means
of performance.
2. Whether the employment relationship may be
terminated at will.
3. Whether the worker engages in an occupation or
business distinct from the employer’s.
4. Whether the type of work done by the worker is
usually done under the employer’s supervision.
5. The skill required to perform the work.
6. Who provides the instrumentalities, tools and place
of work.
7. The length of time for the performance of the
service.
8. Method of payment, or whether payment for work is by
time, piece, rate or job.
9. Whether the worker may hire others.
10. Whether the services are part of the employer’s
regular business.
11. Whether the parties believe they are creating an
employment or independent contractor relationship.
Factors That Determine Employee versus Independent
Contractor Status
The law protects the employee by formulating rules that
affirm the employee status of the working person. However, some
employers still resort to the practice of misclassifying their
workers as independent contractors to save money. How can a worker
know that he or she has been correctly classified as an independent
contractor? Courts consider the following factors:
1. The employer’s right to control the manner and means
of performance. This is the most important factor. If the employer
has the right to exercise complete control over how the worker
should do the work, then the worker is an employee. Employers will
direct the employee what tasks to accomplish and how to accomplish
these tasks.
2. Whether the employment relationship may be
terminated at will. The right to terminate the relationship at will,
without cause, is strong evidence that an employer-employee
relationship exists. Independent contractors are normally bound by
either a written or oral agreement to finish specific tasks or work
and will not be able to “quit” without liability.
3. Whether the worker engages in an occupation or
business distinct from the employer’s. Independent contractors
usually operate their own businesses and advertise themselves to the
general public as ready to perform services similar to the one being
performed for the principal. In other words, the principal is not
the only source of the worker’s income or livelihood.
4. Whether the type of work done by the worker is
usually done under the employer’s supervision. If the work being
performed is subject to extensive supervision, then the work is
likely being performed by an employee. Independent contractors
normally “specialize” in something and a specialist usually works
without supervision.
5. The skill required to perform the work. Workers who
perform tasks which require little or no skill or experience are
generally supervised. Supervision infers an employer-employee
relationship.
6. Who provides the instrumentalities, tools and place
of work. If the tools, instrumentalities and facilities needed for
the work are provided by the employer, this may indicate an
employer-employee relationship.
7. The length of time for the performance of the
service. If the length of time for which the person is to perform
the services is short (for example, only until a specific project is
finished), this may indicate that the relationship is one of
principal-independent contractor.
8. Method of payment, or whether payment for work is by
time, piece, rate or job. If the payment is made by the job, it is
likely that the relationship is one of principal-independent
contractor. Hourly or piece rate methods of payment usually indicate
an employer-employee relationship.
9. Whether the worker may hire others. If the worker
has the right to hire others to assist in the work, then the worker
may be an independent contractor. Employees generally do not have
this right.
10. Whether the services are part of the employer’s
regular business. If the services performed by the worker are a
regular part of the business of the employer, the worker may be
considered an employee. For example, if the employer is in the
elderly care business, then the worker who actually cares for the
elderly is an employee.
11. Whether the parties believe they are creating an
employment or independent contractor relationship. The employment
status that the parties believe they are creating may be shown by a
written or oral contract. However, any contract will be interpreted
in view of the circumstances under which it was made and the conduct
of the parties while the job is being performed.
Correctly classifying a worker as a true independent
contractor or employee may make a big difference in terms of
compensation and benefits for employees and their families. Those
classified as independent contractors in the workplace would be
smart to inquire from an experienced employment attorney to know
what they are really entitled under the law.
©
Law Offices C. Joe Sayas, Jr.
|