|
<
Library - Employment Law
Meal & Rest Periods
BUSINESS NECESSITY IS NO EXCUSE FOR DENYING
EMPLOYEES THEIR LUNCH AND REST BREAKS
Businesses
that involve the continuous flow of customer traffic require the
constant attention of customer service employees. These businesses
face the difficult task of balancing the need of the business to
provide uninterrupted customer service and the need of the employees
to rest or take their meals. When employees need to take breaks
mandated by law, they have to be relieved of their duties for the
duration of the break and another employee must take up their post.
Otherwise, the service interruption results in substantial loss of
income or other detriment to the company.
Some customer service employees who provide
uninterrupted service include parking attendants and cashiers,
valets, security guards, grocery cashiers and waiters. To keep the
payroll costs down, there is a tendency among some employers to hire
only the bare minimum number of employees. However, some employers
do not take into account the need for extra staff who can relieve
other employees who need to go on lunch breaks, rest breaks,
bathroom breaks or unexpected emergencies. Many large and small
companies have failed to establish a procedure that enforces and
monitors lunch and rest breaks as required by law.
Some employees are told that they can get their breaks
only when they are not busy or when they have an available reliever.
Since they may always be too busy to leave their assigned posts and
there is no reliever available, employees may simply suffer through
this ordeal. Some would have to work through their lunch and would
have to forego the rest breaks altogether. When these practices are
tolerated, they could develop into a larger legal problem for the
employer. The situation is aggravated when some managers respond to
employee complaints of rest and meal break violations by threatening
to fire the complainant.
Employers whose business necessities prevent them from
giving lunch breaks and rest breaks to their employees can solve
this problem by paying their employees the extra hour of
compensation that the law requires. Employers cannot just ignore the
lunch and rest break rules as if they do not exist. Neither can
employers claim as excuse or defense that the employees “waived the
right” when they did not take their breaks or they did not ask for
extra pay.
The California Wage Orders require employers to provide
the meal and rest breaks to hourly workers under the following
rules:
Meal Breaks. A 30-minute meal period must be authorized
for each employee for every 5 hours of work. During the meal period,
the employee must be relieved of all duties. If the employee is not
relieved of all duties, the employee is considered to be “on-duty”
and the meal period will be counted as time worked. If the meal
break is not provided as required, the employer shall pay the
employee one hour of pay at the employee’s regular rate for each
workday that the meal break is missed. When a meal period is waived,
the employee is entitled to compensation for all the working time,
including any on-the-job meal periods.
Rest Period. Rest breaks should be authorized for all
employees whose total daily work time is at least three and one-half
(3 ½) hours. The required rest time shall be based on the total
hours worked daily at the rate of ten (10) minutes net rest time per
four (4) hours. If the rest break is not provided as required, the
employee shall be paid one hour of pay at the regular rate for each
workday that the rest period is missed.
Companies who ignored break time rules learned the hard
way that they cannot sacrifice the employees’ welfare for the
company’s bottom line. In 2005, one of the world’s largest retailers
was ordered to pay over $170 million in damages to about 116,000 of
its former and current California employees for this violation.
Several restaurant chains have faced similar lawsuits to recover
compensation for workers’ missed breaks. These lawsuits serve as an
important lesson to employers everywhere: The needs of the business
do not justify or excuse violations of the lunch and rest break
rules.
©
Law Offices C. Joe Sayas, Jr.
|