 |
|
<
Library - Employment Law
Wage Claims, Overtime & Other Employee Compensation
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS FOR NURSES AND OTHER
EMPLOYEES CANNOT BE LESS THAN THE PREVAILING WAGE RATES
|
Q: I
am a registered nurse who was recruited from the
Philippines to come over and work here in the United
States. I signed a contract with a recruitment agency
that I will be paid the prevailing wage rate for nurses
who work in Los Angeles. I recently discovered that I am
being paid less than the prevailing wage rate. If I quit
and look for another employer I will be forced to pay
$30,000 for breach of contract. What are my options?
|
A:
Your situation is very similar to two Filipino nurses who were
allowed by the California Court of Appeal to proceed with their
claims against a staffing company. The company required the nurses,
Elena Sinolinding and Bermalyn Bascug, to sign an agreement
indicating that they will be paid the prevailing wage rate provided
by the Labor Department. The staffing company’s contract also
required each of them to reimburse the company $20,000 for
recruitment and training if the nurses breached the contract.
It was only when the nurses had left the Philippines
and had been working for several months in the United States that
they discovered they were being paid less than the prevailing wage
rate. The nurses quit their jobs and sued the staffing agency, not
only on behalf of themselves but also on behalf of other nurses who
were employed and were similarly treated by the staffing company.
The nurses alleged that the staffing agency violated
federal regulations and the Labor Code. Federal regulations required
employers hiring foreign workers to pay these workers the prevailing
wage rate. The Labor Code prohibits employers from requiring an
employee to agree in writing to a term or condition of employment
when the employer knows that such term or condition is prohibited by
law. The contract the nurses signed also contained illegal penalty
provisions in the guise of liquidated damages.
The staffing company argued that the failure to pay the
prevailing wage provided by the Department of Labor was not
prohibited by law. The employer also argued that the nurses cannot
bring the lawsuit on behalf of others because they had not satisfied
the procedural requirements for bringing a class action. Although
the trial court agreed with the staffing company, the appellate
court did not.
The appellate court found, among other things, that the
nurses may sue the staffing company for failure to pay the
prevailing wage rates and for failure to pay minimum wage; and that
the nurses did not need to comply with class action requirements to
bring a claim under the Private Attorney General Act (PAGA). The law
allows an aggrieved employee to bring a claim “on behalf of himself
or herself and other current and former employees.” It makes no
reference to any of the requirements for bringing a class action.
These recent cases should be instructive to both
employees and employers: Employees, particularly the nurses who
enter into unlawful contracts, do have recourse in our courts.
Employers are also alerted to the fact that failing to pay the
required wage rates or providing undue restrictions in employment
agreements may give rise to employee claims under PAGA.
©
Law Offices C. Joe Sayas, Jr.
|
|
[C. Joe
Sayas, Jr., Esq. is an experienced trial attorney helping to protect
the rights of employees, policyholders, and consumers. Mr. Sayas has
obtained multi-million dollar recoveries for his clients and their
families in cases involving serious personal injuries, wrongful
death, insurance claims, wage and hour (overtime) litigation and
unfair business practices. He is currently Class Counsel to
thousands of employees seeking recovery of back wages and consumers
seeking damages arising from the sale of insurance policies. He is a
graduate of Georgetown University Law Center Washington, D.C. and
the University of the Philippines.]

Disclaimer:
As a public service, the Law Offices of C. Joe Sayas, Jr. has
prepared informative articles on topics of interest to consumers and
policyholders. Nothing contained in these articles should be
construed as creating or intending to create an attorney-client
relationship or purporting to give legal advice on individual
matters. Due to constant changes in the law, exceptions to general
rules of law, and factual differences, please seek professional
legal advice before acting on any matter.
<back to top>

700 N. Central Avenue, Suite 235
Glendale, California 91203
818-291-0088
|
|
|