 |
|
<
Library - Employment Law
Wage Claims, Overtime & Other Employee Compensation
SHOULD EMPLOYEES BE PAID FOR WORK-RELATED
WAIT TIME?
|
Q:
I work for a department
store as a sales clerk. At the end of each shift, it is
mandatory for us to have our supervisors inspect our
bags before we leave the store premises. We would be
reprimanded or disciplined if we leave without
inspection. Usually, I have already clocked out for my
8-hour shift while I wait for the manager to be
available to check my bag. I would usually wait anywhere
from 15 to 30 minutes before I can get out of the store.
This happens almost everyday. Should I be paid for the
extra minutes that I waited? |
A:
Yes. Based on the level of employer control and the benefit the
store derived from the extra minutes you spent waiting, you are be
entitled to additional compensation. Since you already worked for 8
hours, you are also entitled to overtime pay.
There are work-related tasks that employees do for the
employer’s benefit that employees should be additionally
compensated. These activities fall within “work time,” which is
essentially the time an employee spends on activities that are
controlled by and for the benefit of the employer. Work time
includes all the time that the employee is required to be present at
the workplace.
Examples of these activities are:
1) time spent changing clothes or washing
on the employer’s premises as compelled by the necessities of the
employer’s business;
2) time spent attending training programs,
lectures and meetings directly related to the employee’s job and
where attendance is mandatory;
3) time spent on intern programs for the
benefit of a specific employer;
4) try-out time that includes training that
results in productivity for the employer; and
5) reporting time pay where an employee is
required to report for work and does report, but is not put to work.
In retail industry, particularly department or grocery
stores, employers will require employees to undergo bag inspections
before the employees can leave the store premises for breaks or at
the end of their shifts. The bag inspections are part of the
employer’s loss prevention efforts to stop or discourage internal
theft by employees. Although bag checks in and of themselves are not
prohibited by California law, it becomes problematic when the bag
checks consume a significant amount of the employee’s own personal
time.
This very same issue was litigated by former and
current employees of Polo Ralph Lauren. The employees alleged that
the company failed to pay its employees for the time they spent
waiting for and undergoing bag checks at the end of their shifts.
The employees alleged that they would wait up to half an hour for
the bag checks to be performed before they can leave the stores.
The Polo Ralph Lauren employees argued that since they
were locked inside their stores after they had clocked out at the
end of their shifts while waiting for the bag checks, the physical
confinement plainly demonstrated the employer’s “control” over them.
Therefore, since their time was subject to the employer’s control to
benefit the employer, the employer owed them additional compensation
for the time they spent related to the bag checks. The 6,000
employees obtained a $4 million mid-trial settlement for their
efforts.
Employers who accept the benefits of the work performed
by its non-exempt employees must pay the wages due to the employees.
Anything less is unfair to the employees and they have the right to
find redress under the law. ©
©
Law Offices C. Joe Sayas, Jr.
|
|
[C. Joe
Sayas, Jr., Esq. is an experienced trial attorney helping to protect
the rights of employees, policyholders, and consumers. Mr. Sayas has
obtained multi-million dollar recoveries for his clients and their
families in cases involving serious personal injuries, wrongful
death, insurance claims, wage and hour (overtime) litigation and
unfair business practices. He is currently Class Counsel to
thousands of employees seeking recovery of back wages and consumers
seeking damages arising from the sale of insurance policies. He is a
graduate of Georgetown University Law Center Washington, D.C. and
the University of the Philippines.]

Disclaimer:
As a public service, the Law Offices of C. Joe Sayas, Jr. has
prepared informative articles on topics of interest to consumers and
policyholders. Nothing contained in these articles should be
construed as creating or intending to create an attorney-client
relationship or purporting to give legal advice on individual
matters. Due to constant changes in the law, exceptions to general
rules of law, and factual differences, please seek professional
legal advice before acting on any matter.
<back to top>

700 N. Central Avenue, Suite 235
Glendale, California 91203
818-291-0088
|
|
|