< Library - Employment Law 
Employee Rights  

WHEN EMPLOYEES TAKE A PAY CUT
(When Is it Illegal?)

Q:  My employer is proposing to reduce my hourly pay supposedly because of the bad economy. If our company is really losing money and I have to agree to a pay cut to keep my job, then I will. My problem, however, is that out of the more than the 10 employees who have the same job duties as me, it seems I am the only one being asked to take a pay cut. Is this fair? What are my rights when it comes to taking pay cuts?

A:  Employers may routinely change the terms or amount of an employee’s compensation. The change may be favorable (e.g., employees get a pay raise) or unfavorable (e.g., employees get a pay cut). The employer’s ability to change an employee’s compensation will partly depend on the employment relationship and the parties’ agreements.

      The employment relationship may be based on a written contract or a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) in the case of union members. Or it may be an “at-will” employment.

      Contract-based Employment: If the employment is based on a contract, then the terms and conditions, including compensation, is governed by the contract. The terms of a contract may be changed during the term of the contract only if both parties agree to the change. Therefore, employee compensation cannot be changed during the term of the contract unless the employee agrees to the change. If, for example, the contract employee does not agree to the pay cut, but the employer cuts the employee’s pay anyway, the employer has violated the contract and may become liable for damages. Changes in the contract usually have to be in writing and signed by both parties.

      At-will Employment: If there is no employment contract or CBA, the employment relationship is considered “at-will.”  This means that the employment relationship may be terminated by either party without liability. In at-will employment, employers may reduce an employee’s compensation without the employee’s express consent. The employer may notify the employee about the pay cut in as little as a week. An employee may be deemed to have accepted the pay cut if the employee continues to work for the employer after receiving notice of the pay cut. If the employee does not like the pay cut, the employee may quit and look for a job elsewhere and the employer will not be liable for damages.

      However, an at-will employment relationship does not give employers permission to discriminate or retaliate against employees by way of compensation. A decrease in compensation must not have an unlawful reason behind it.  Employers may not decrease employee compensation based on the employee’s gender, age, religion, race/ethnicity, disability, marital status, or pregnancy. Employers may also not decrease employee compensation in order to retaliate against employees who have asserted their legal rights, or against “whistleblowers.”

      When employers ask their employees to take a pay cut, employees will necessarily ask why. Some reasons will appear obvious and reasonable. For example, the company may be unable to stay afloat in this bad economy. It may start to lay off people or ask some employees to take a pay cut instead.

      Some reasons may not be so obvious. An employee who just turned 65 might be asked to take a pay cut. The same thing may happen to a pregnant employee or one who wanted to collect unpaid overtime. In these scenarios, where only specific employees are targeted but other employees are not affected, the implementation of a pay cut should be investigated to determine if the employer is engaged in unlawful discrimination or retaliation. Under these circumstances, it might be wise for the employee to consult with an experienced employment attorney to discuss how he or she may protect his or her rights.

© Law Offices C. Joe Sayas, Jr.
 

[C. Joe Sayas, Jr., Esq. is an experienced trial attorney helping to protect the rights of employees, policyholders, and consumers. Mr. Sayas has obtained multi-million dollar recoveries for his clients and their families in cases involving serious personal injuries, wrongful death, insurance claims, wage and hour (overtime) litigation and unfair business practices. He is currently Class Counsel to thousands of employees seeking recovery of back wages and consumers seeking damages arising from the sale of insurance policies. He is a graduate of Georgetown University Law Center Washington, D.C. and the University of the Philippines.]

Disclaimer: As a public service, the Law Offices of C. Joe Sayas, Jr. has prepared informative articles on topics of interest to consumers and policyholders. Nothing contained in these articles should be construed as creating or intending to create an attorney-client relationship or purporting to give legal advice on individual matters. Due to constant changes in the law, exceptions to general rules of law, and factual differences, please seek professional legal advice before acting on any matter.


<back to top>


700 N. Central Avenue, Suite 235
Glendale, California 91203
818-291-0088

 

Home   Practice Areas  Our Attorneys  Cases   Consumer Information   Contact Us