Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Survivors Cannot be Forced into Arbitration

Posted by Joe Sayas | Apr 08, 2022 | 0 Comments

Arbitration is a procedure to resolve disputes without filing a complaint in court. By signing an employment arbitration agreement, the employee agrees to adjudicate any claim against the employer before an arbitrator and not before a judge or a jury. This means the employee cannot sue that employer in court. Unlike court proceedings which are public, an arbitration proceeding is a private process and its results are generally confidential and not disclosed. Many studies regarding arbitration outcomes show that they favor the defendants and defense firms that pay the bills. Arbitrators are not required to follow the law, and there is little opportunity to appeal an arbitrator's ruling.

The use of arbitration in employment disputes has often been seen as problematic. It is usually not a product of negotiation between parties of equal power. The employer may make the signing of an arbitration agreement a condition of employment. Employees often automatically sign these types of agreements without understanding the consequences. Nowhere is the impact of arbitration agreements more tragic than in sexual misconduct claims that are later denied access to the courts. Since the complaint is not brought in the open, the wrongful conduct may continue to persist.

California passed into law Assembly Bill 51 (AB 51) effective January 2020, which prohibits employers from requiring employees, as a condition of employment, to sign mandatory arbitration agreements to resolve discrimination claims covered under FEHA and for any claims under the Labor Code, including wages and other employee protections. However, courts were faced with the uncertainty of upholding AB 51 because it was seen as likely contradicting the federal statute, the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).    

On March 3, 2022, President Biden signed a new federal law called Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021, previously passed by Congress. The bill, H.R. 4445, amends the FAA to make it possible for survivors of sexual assault and victims of sexual harassment to sue in court and not be forced to arbitrate their legal claims. The new law provides the following:

  • Employees with sexual assault or sexual harassment claims are no longer forced to arbitration even if they previously signed an agreement limiting their legal remedies to arbitration only.
  • The new law applies to “pre-dispute” arbitration agreements entered into before the occurrence of the alleged harassment or assault and does not apply to agreements to arbitrate reached after a dispute arises.
  • Pre-dispute mandatory arbitration agreements are not outright prohibited. Instead, the law gives victims the choice of either arbitrating their sexual assault or sexual harassment claims or instead suing in court. The employee ultimately gets to decide whether to arbitrate or sue in court.
  • Employees may choose to sue as an individual or through a class action, regardless of whether the employee also signed a Class Action Waiver (an agreement waiving their right to class or collective action).
  • Whether this new law applies to a given set of facts will be decided by a federal judge and not an arbitrator.
  • This new law is partially retroactive. Any existing forced arbitration agreements signed before March 3, 2022 are now voidable, even if the individual signed the forced arbitration agreement before March 3, 2022. However, prior cases that have already been completed through forced arbitration cannot be reopened and litigated in court.
  • Aside from employees, other people potentially affected by this law include clients, customers, patients, and consumers. These persons are often required to sign forced arbitration agreements in order to avail of services.

A conventional civil lawsuit in state or federal court adds greater transparency and should make it less easy for companies to sweep sexual harassment or sexual assault claims under the rug by offering the accuser money and a confidential settlement. The confidential nature of the settlement means that the perpetrator can more easily find a new victim. The new law, which received bipartisan support in Congress and the U.S. Senate, hopes to end the culture of silence and secrecy that protects perpetrators at the cost of victims' rights.

About the Author

Joe Sayas

C. JOE SAYAS, JR., Esq. Recognized as one of California's top employment and labor law attorneys by the Daily Journal, C. Joe Sayas, Jr. has devoted his more than 25-year litigation career to protecting workers' and consumer rights. He has fought for employees discriminated due to disability, ra...


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today

Your inquiries are welcome at no cost!

You’re here likely because you have a question that needs an answer. You may be struggling with decisions that may affect your rights. We have decades of experience handling life-altering and high-value cases in employment law, insurance law, and civil rights. You can depend on us to help you with the compassion that you deserve.

Talk to us and find out how we can help you. Call us at (818) 291-0088 or fill out our contact form today.